Christoph Trattner / Press & opinionBergen, Norway / 07

Press & opinion

Research in the
public conversation.

Writing, interviews and coverage on responsible AI for media and health, including food and nutrition, alongside learning and research policy. A clear route from public debate back to the evidence.

Research in public 2017—2026

Media.
Food.
Algorithms.
Society.

Authored commentaryResearch coverage

Research beyond the journal

When online recipes
became a public question.

Selected reporting on food, health and recommendation.
Authored commentary is identified in the archive.

From research to public discussion. These articles report on collaborative research. The archive also includes a UiB-produced profile at forskning.no, an expert comment in MIT News, and authored News & Views in Nature Sustainability.

Explore the food research →

The reading room

Writing & media archive

Original headlines. English summaries.
Read each piece at its publisher.

34 selected pieces

Recent first · partial dates are labelled
Opinion
Digi

Ledere trenger ærlige svar om bruk av KI

Making honest AI disclosure part of quality control

Leaders need clear accounts of how AI contributed and how results were checked. Approved tools, open discussion and time for verification make that possible.

Response / debate
Journalisten

Redaksjonen må eie arbeidsflyten, ikke bare testen

A response from Fjell-Ljom’s editors

Responding to my article on testing newsroom AI, Fjell-Ljom’s editors describe why control over workflows, data and repeatable evaluation matters alongside model performance.

Popular science
Forskersonen / forskning.no

Disse nyhetene klikker vi mest på

How headline framing shapes the reading experience

Our RecSys study explores whether AI-assisted headline reframing can reduce perceived polarization and negative emotion. This article explains the findings, their limits and why editorial checking remains essential.

Editorial
Science

Keep AI-augmented science contestable

Keeping AI-assisted research open to scrutiny

As AI takes on a greater role in research, scientists need to be able to inspect, challenge and correct its contributions. An editorial on preserving scrutiny and accountability in AI-assisted science.

Opinion
University World News

Academia needs a reset button on its power structures

Distinguishing academic achievement from the right to lead

Research achievement, leadership competence and institutional power are different things. Universities need open competition and meaningful leadership assessment to give new voices a fair chance.

Opinion
Medier24

KI kan skrive saken. Hvem lærer å vurdere den?

How will new journalists learn to judge AI-written work?

When AI writes the first draft, newsrooms still need a plan for developing the judgement required to check it. Editors should ask what each automated task used to teach new colleagues—and how they will gain that experience now.

Opinion
Universitas

Forskjellen på kalkulatoren og KI

Why AI is not just another calculator

Doing better with AI is not the same as retaining the skills needed to check its answers. An argument for keeping the human part of the thinking visible.

Opinion
Journalisten

Hva har KI-eksperten egentlig gjort?

What has the AI expert actually done?

Journalists need more than an “AI expert” label. I argue for naming the work behind an expert’s claims and making the limits of that expertise explicit.

Opinion
Dagsavisen

Hva skal KI-generasjonen gi videre?

What will the AI generation pass on?

Today’s students will teach tomorrow’s professionals. Schools need to assess both what learners produce with AI and what they can understand and do on their own.

Opinion
Dagens Medisin

Når pasienten sier «ChatGPT sa …»

When a patient says “ChatGPT told me…”

An opinion piece on AI-generated health advice and the importance of discussing chatbot use in clinical consultations, drawing on research into the reliability of AI-generated nutrition information.

Response / debate
Aftenposten

Nyhetsbilder trenger en innholdsdeklarasjon

News images need a record of their origins

Photojournalist Nora Savosnick responds to my article on content credentials, arguing for provenance information that follows news photographs all the way to readers.

Opinion
Medier24

Hvor hardt skal vi dytte på leseren?

How hard should we nudge the reader?

A changed news feed can change clicks without changing interests. Responsible recommendation should help readers discover more while respecting their decision to say no.

Opinion
Aftenposten

Hva er saltet i journalistikken?

When provenance becomes a seal of approval

Content credentials document where an image came from. That is not the same as proving a news source deserves our trust. The distinction matters for readers and newsrooms.

Opinion
Teknisk Ukeblad

Innovasjon stopper i overgangene

Innovation stalls between research and use

Promising research can lose momentum between a project, a prototype and everyday use. Shared ownership and sustained collaboration need to survive those transitions.

Opinion
Medier24

KI gjør innhold billigere – og tillit dyrere

AI makes content cheaper, and trust more costly

Labelling synthetic material is only part of the task. Journalism also needs ways to make authentic content traceable when it travels beyond a publisher’s own platform.

Interview
Studvest

Gjør KI virkeligheten uklar?

How AI-edited images shape trust

An interview in Studvest’s expert-explainer series on image manipulation, media literacy and how people judge the information they encounter.

News & Views · Authored commentary
Nature Sustainability

What online data say about eating habits

A News & Views commentary on how online behaviour can help explain shifts towards diets with smaller environmental footprints.

Research coverage
Kurier

Onlinerezepte: beliebt, aber ungesund

Reporting on Trattner and colleagues’ research into the nutritional quality and popularity of online recipes, including how recommendation algorithms can promote healthier choices.

A curated selection, not a complete media record. “Opinion” identifies my own writing; interviews and responses identify the original author. English titles and summaries are editorial guides, not full translations. Dates appear at the precision verified; partial dates are placed after precisely dated entries in the same period. Some publishers may require a subscription.

For the next conversation

For journalists & editors

Get in touch ↗

A short introduction

Christoph Trattner is Professor of Information Science at the University of Bergen and founder and director of SFI MediaFutures. His research focuses on responsible AI for media and health, spanning news recommendation, AI-supported journalism and trustworthy health information. His food research examines how online recipes and recommender systems can support healthier, more sustainable choices. He is Principal Investigator of CuratedAI and VaccAI, and an ACM Distinguished Speaker. His publications include research in Nature Food and scholarly commentary in Science and Nature Sustainability.

Download biography ↓

Topics I work on

  • News recommendation, media trust and provenance
  • Responsible AI in health and food
  • AI, human judgement and independent capability
  • Research–industry collaboration and innovation

Please include your topic, outlet, format and deadline. I will clarify what I can speak to and what evidence it rests on.

Press photographs & media kit

The existing press-image gallery and downloadable kit are on the Services page, with image credits and contact details.

Open press resources ↗

Check image credits and usage arrangements before publication.

Media enquiries trattner.christoph@gmail.com

For invited talks and advisory work, see Services →