The question behind AI panic: What happens to me if it works?
AI at work: incentives, trust and job security
Why employees may hesitate to reveal AI productivity gains when their jobs could change.
A place to start
Ideas for a public conversation,
grounded in research.
AI at work: incentives, trust and job security
Why employees may hesitate to reveal AI productivity gains when their jobs could change.
Making honest AI disclosure part of quality control
Leaders need clear accounts of how AI contributed and how results were checked. Approved tools, open discussion and time for verification make that possible.
Assessing what academic leadership enables
Academic leadership needs evidence of how people develop, teams work and shared capability endures. An argument for evaluating leadership in practice alongside research achievement.
The reading room
Original headlines. English summaries.
Read each piece at its publisher.
34 selected pieces
Recent first · partial dates are labelledAI at work: incentives, trust and job security
Why employees may hesitate to reveal AI productivity gains when their jobs could change.
Making honest AI disclosure part of quality control
Leaders need clear accounts of how AI contributed and how results were checked. Approved tools, open discussion and time for verification make that possible.
Assessing what academic leadership enables
Academic leadership needs evidence of how people develop, teams work and shared capability endures. An argument for evaluating leadership in practice alongside research achievement.
A response from Fjell-Ljom’s editors
Responding to my article on testing newsroom AI, Fjell-Ljom’s editors describe why control over workflows, data and repeatable evaluation matters alongside model performance.
How headline framing shapes the reading experience
Our RecSys study explores whether AI-assisted headline reframing can reduce perceived polarization and negative emotion. This article explains the findings, their limits and why editorial checking remains essential.
Making the ability to test AI part of newsroom procurement
Newsrooms need to test AI tools on their own journalistic tasks, document failures and repeat evaluations when systems change. The ability to investigate performance should come with the purchase.
Keeping AI-assisted research open to scrutiny
As AI takes on a greater role in research, scientists need to be able to inspect, challenge and correct its contributions. An editorial on preserving scrutiny and accountability in AI-assisted science.
Distinguishing academic achievement from the right to lead
Research achievement, leadership competence and institutional power are different things. Universities need open competition and meaningful leadership assessment to give new voices a fair chance.
How will new journalists learn to judge AI-written work?
When AI writes the first draft, newsrooms still need a plan for developing the judgement required to check it. Editors should ask what each automated task used to teach new colleagues—and how they will gain that experience now.
Why AI is not just another calculator
Doing better with AI is not the same as retaining the skills needed to check its answers. An argument for keeping the human part of the thinking visible.
What has the AI expert actually done?
Journalists need more than an “AI expert” label. I argue for naming the work behind an expert’s claims and making the limits of that expertise explicit.
What will the AI generation pass on?
Today’s students will teach tomorrow’s professionals. Schools need to assess both what learners produce with AI and what they can understand and do on their own.
When a patient says “ChatGPT told me…”
An opinion piece on AI-generated health advice and the importance of discussing chatbot use in clinical consultations, drawing on research into the reliability of AI-generated nutrition information.
News images need a record of their origins
Photojournalist Nora Savosnick responds to my article on content credentials, arguing for provenance information that follows news photographs all the way to readers.
How hard should we nudge the reader?
A changed news feed can change clicks without changing interests. Responsible recommendation should help readers discover more while respecting their decision to say no.
When provenance becomes a seal of approval
Content credentials document where an image came from. That is not the same as proving a news source deserves our trust. The distinction matters for readers and newsrooms.
Making research entrepreneurship worth the risk
An argument for aligning researchers’ risk, control and rewards when universities seek to turn research into new companies.
Innovation stalls between research and use
Promising research can lose momentum between a project, a prototype and everyday use. Shared ownership and sustained collaboration need to survive those transitions.
AI makes content cheaper, and trust more costly
Labelling synthetic material is only part of the task. Journalism also needs ways to make authentic content traceable when it travels beyond a publisher’s own platform.
When better writing reveals less about learning
AI-assisted work can look excellent without revealing what its author understands. Assessment needs to distinguish polished output from independent capability.
Why not require leadership competence?
Universities prepare academics to teach. Leadership also needs preparation before people take responsibility for staff, budgets and institutional direction.
Higher education belongs at the heart of research policy
Students, researchers and lasting institutional knowledge are part of the infrastructure that turns research into value. Innovation policy should not separate them from the research it funds.
The application is not the research
AI-polished applications make it more important to separate the quality of a scientific idea from the quality of its written presentation.
How AI-edited images shape trust
An interview in Studvest’s expert-explainer series on image manipulation, media literacy and how people judge the information they encounter.
Coverage of research by Trattner, Jia Hua Jeng and Alain Starke on sentiment and reader responses to climate news.
Reporting on the Nature Food study of 600 dinner recipes from Norway, the UK and the US, examining their healthiness and environmental impact.
A separate News & Views article discusses recipe analysis and cites the Nature Food research by Angelsen, Starke and Trattner.
What AI can learn from journalism ethics
An earlier argument for using professional journalism ethics to guide the design and evaluation of responsible AI, without reducing ethics to a checklist.
A profile connecting Trattner’s food-recommendation research with the development of responsible recommendations for news and other media.
A News & Views commentary on how online behaviour can help explain shifts towards diets with smaller environmental footprints.
MIT News quoted Trattner on the potential of image-based recipe retrieval for nutrition tracking and cooking support, discussing MIT and QCRI's Pic2Recipe research.
An accessible account of the online-recipe study, examining nutrition, user ratings and recommendation, with Trattner quoted and identified as a study author.
Reporting on Trattner and colleagues’ research into the nutritional quality and popularity of online recipes, including how recommendation algorithms can promote healthier choices.
Coverage of the study comparing the nutritional quality of online recipes, cookbook recipes and ready meals, and the implications for recipe recommendation.
Try a broader search or clear the filters.
A curated selection, not a complete media record. “Opinion” identifies my own writing; interviews and responses identify the original author. English titles and summaries are editorial guides, not full translations. Dates appear at the precision verified; partial dates are placed after precisely dated entries in the same period. Some publishers may require a subscription.
For the next conversation
Christoph Trattner is Professor of Information Science at the University of Bergen and founder and director of SFI MediaFutures. His research focuses on responsible AI for media and health, spanning news recommendation, AI-supported journalism and trustworthy health information. His food research examines how online recipes and recommender systems can support healthier, more sustainable choices. He is Principal Investigator of CuratedAI and VaccAI, and an ACM Distinguished Speaker. His publications include research in Nature Food and scholarly commentary in Science and Nature Sustainability.
Please include your topic, outlet, format and deadline. I will clarify what I can speak to and what evidence it rests on.
The existing press-image gallery and downloadable kit are on the Services page, with image credits and contact details.
Open press resources ↗Check image credits and usage arrangements before publication.
Media enquiries trattner.christoph@gmail.com
For invited talks and advisory work, see Services →